Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Why 10?   I'd think we could come up with a slightly less arbitrary number, 

Well, it's probably within an order of magnitude of the right thing ;-).
We know we don't want 1, but 100 seems awfully optimistic.

If someone can come up with a more defensible number then I'm all for
it.  Greg Stark's thought about a power correction seemed interesting
too, though again far too optimistic to trust without some good math
to back it up.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to