On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 05:16:56PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 13:28:04 -0500, > > > > What you are saying here is that if you want more accurate statistics, you > > need to sample more rows. That is true. However, the size of the sample > > is essentially only dependent on the accuracy you need and not the size > > of the population, for large populations. > > > That's nonsense.
Huh, have you studied any statistics? -- Alvaro Herrera (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) "At least to kernel hackers, who really are human, despite occasional rumors to the contrary" (LWN.net) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
