> Tom Lane wrote: >> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: >> > Please see my posting about using a macro for snprintf. If the >> current >> > implementation of snprintf is enough for our existing translation >> users >> > we probably don't need to add anything more to it because snprintf >> will >> > not be exported to client applications. >> >> The CVS-tip implementation is fundamentally broken and won't work even >> for our internal uses. I've not wasted time complaining about it >> because I thought we were going to replace it. If we can't find a >> usable replacement then we're going to have to put a lot of effort >> into fixing what's there. On the whole I think the effort would be >> better spent importing someone else's solution. > > Oh, so our existing implementation doesn't even meet our needs. OK.
Wasn't the issue about odd behavior of the Win32 linker choosing the wrong vnsprintf? ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
