Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I brought this up a few months ago. Tom, weren't your objections
> based more on implementation concerns than on whether the idea
> itself had merit?
No, my point was that making implicit sequences work transparently
requires more thought than this. I'd like to see a fairly complete
plan put forward before we start installing random hacks on permissions.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
