On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:17:40PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >>I don't think that's a bug. You may not intend ever to cluster on that
> >>index again, and if you try it will tell you about the problem.
> >
> >
> >Except it breaks the 'cluster everything' case:
> >
> >test=# cluster;
> >ERROR: cannot cluster when index access method does not handle null values
> >HINT: You may be able to work around this by marking column "a" NOT NULL.
>
> Any further comments on this? I still think it's a bug, ie. an
> invariant that's not being maintained...
I agree with your observation. What sense does it make to allow marking
an index "clusterable", knowing in advance that it will error out at
cluster time? None to me.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
"La persona que no quería pecar / estaba obligada a sentarse
en duras y empinadas sillas / desprovistas, por cierto
de blandos atenuantes" (Patricio Vogel)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
