Andrew - Supernews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 2005-04-10, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The impression I get is that most of the 'Unicode characters above >> 0x10000' reports we've seen did not come from people who actually needed >> more-than-16-bit Unicode codepoints, but from people who had screwed up >> their encoding settings and were trying to tell the backend that Latin1 >> was Unicode or some such.
> I think you will find that this impression is actually false. Or that at > the very least, _correct_ verification of UTF-8 sequences will still > catch essentially all cases of non-utf-8 input mislabelled as utf-8 > while allowing the full range of Unicode codepoints. Yeah? Cool. Does John's proposed patch do it "correctly"? http://candle.pha.pa.us/mhonarc/patches2/msg00076.html regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
