> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 4:29 PM
> To: Dave Held
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler
> headaches!! :)
>
> [...]
> I didn't mean people can't or shouldn't make suggestions, just
> that beyond a certain point advocacy seems unnecessary.
Fair enough.
> I suspect most people here are already well aware of the
> advantages and disadvantages of C++.
That's where we disagree. In my experience, most C++ programmers
know C, but most C programmers only know C++ through second-hand
knowledge. And this community has already professed a fairly
thorough commitment to C. I also don't find the rebuttals to the
arguments for migration to be particularly compelling. In this
case, I wouldn't even ask the core developers to do all the work.
I would volunteer to do a lot of the grunt work in making the code
base valid C++ (and I suspect several others would as well), and
doing the other updates to make the code more idiomatic C++. I
would only ask them to play along when the style shifts.
> Apologies if I have offended you.
No offense taken.
__
David B. Held
Software Engineer/Array Services Group
200 14th Ave. East, Sartell, MN 56377
320.534.3637 320.253.7800 800.752.8129
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
