On Mon, 2 May 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:On Mon, 2 May 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I posted this compromise and no one replied so I thought everyone was OK with it. It gets it into CVS, but has a separate compile stage to deal with the recursive dependency problem.
Then what is the point of having it in CVS? Other then to make are tar ball bigger?
So it can be maintained with other PL languages as the internal API changes. This is the same reason ecpg is in our CVS because it is tied to the grammar.
Since when? I thought you didn't need the PostgreSQL sources in order to compile pl/PHP, only the installed headers/libraries ... Joshua, has something changed, or did I mis-understand that requirement?
---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
