Never mind. multi is in effect a TransactionId in that code path, and thus
the assertion makes sense. Sorry for the noise.
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
There's an assertion in multixact.c, MultiXactIdExpand function, line 273:
Assert(!TransactionIdEquals(multi, xid));
where multi is a MultiXactId and xid is a TransactionId.
Isn't this bogus? If I understand the code correctly, multixactids and
regular xids live in completely separate id spaces. Therefore a comparison
between them makes no sense.
- Heikki
- Heikki
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
