Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 2:49 PM
> To: John Hansen
> Cc: Tatsuo Ishii; [email protected];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch for collation using ICU
>
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 02:07:29PM +1000, John Hansen wrote:
> > Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>
> > > So Japanese(including ASCII)/UNICODE behavior is
> perfectly correct
> > > at this moment.
> >
> > Right, so you _never_ use accented ascii characters in Japanese?
> > (like � for example, whose uppercase is �)
>
> That isn't ASCII. It's latin1 or some other ASCII extension.
Point taken...
But...
If you want EUC_JP (Japanese + ASCII) then use that as your backend encoding,
not UTF-8 (unicode).
UTF-8 encoded databases are very useful for representing multiple languages in
the same database,
but this usefulness vanishes if functions like upper/lower doesn't work
correctly.
So optimizing for 3 languages breaks more than a hundred, that's doesn't seem
fair!
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) "La principal
> caracter�stica humana es la tonter�a"
> (Augusto Monterroso)
>
>
... John
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
