On T, 2005-05-10 at 16:31 +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote: > On E, 2005-05-09 at 23:30 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> There are 2 possibly expensive steps: > > 1. the conversion to "AND'ed list of simple clauses" (unknown > complexity) > > 2. matching each of "simple" clauses in the and list with all others > (should be N+(N-1)+(N-2)+..+(1) ~= 2N) complexity) actually not 2N but (N * ((N-1)/2) , thus 3 clauses need 2+1=3 checks and 11 clasues need (10+9+..+1) = 55 checks. -- Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster