Andrew, > down, if positioned right, but can help people to see where things are > going, and where the gaps are. This could in a sense be as simple as > prioritising the TODO list. Right now anybody who wants to contribute > and looks at the list has no idea if the item is considered important or > even if it is still thought to be desirable. There are many changes that > can be rung on this theme - you would probably want to keep the "roadmap > process" as light as possible for the cultural reasons you mention.
The substantial problem here is that nobody *wants* to create a roadmap type document. If you can find a volunteer, it'd be worth discussing -- I can see a way we can make a "roadmap" without being deceptive about how we get features. -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly