* Bruce Momjian (pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) wrote: > Douglas McNaught wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > > > I modified the TODO. I think we only need an INT4. I realize INT8 > > > would be for IPV6 but I can't imagine a network that has more than INT4 > > > hosts (not part of the network address). > > > > Actually "increment the host address" isn't a well-defined concept for > > IPV6. The "host" part of the address (if you're on an Ethernet) is > > generally the 64 bit MAC address. > > So if the network card dies the machine has a new IPv6 address and you > just update your DNS? Do you update your routing tables?
Generally routing isn't done to the last 48 bits (dunno where 64 bit
came from, but MAC's are 48 last I checked :).
DNS to that level would need to be changed though, yes.. :/
(I'm not exactly a big fan of this development, in fact, I think it's a
bunch of poo, but then, I don't write the standards).
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
