Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'm getting time, timetz, and horology regression failures in HEAD > > on Solaris 9 / gcc 3.4.2. So are other machines in the build farm, > > such as this one: > > I'll bet a nickel this broke it: > > 2005-05-25 23:48 momjian > > * src/: backend/utils/adt/datetime.c, > interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/interval.c: Display only 9 not 10 digits > of precision for timestamp values when using non-integer > timestamps. This prevents the display of rounding errors for > common values like days < 32.
Yea, backing out. I thought I tested it, but I guess not. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
