On Wed, 25 May 2005 18:19:19 -0400, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> but it keeps a list (hash table, file, whatever) of those blocks. >> [...] Is it sufficient to >> remember just the relation and the block number or do we need the >> contents a well? > >We don't *have* the contents ... that's exactly why it's panicking ...
I meant the contents of the WAL record, not the original block contents. Anyway, I think it's not needed. Servus Manfred ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq