Hi Josh!
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:13:52AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> Yeah. I'd prefer per-database quotas, rather than per-user quotas, which
> seem kind of useless. The hard part is making any transaction which
> would exceed the per-database quota roll back cleanly with a
> comprehensible error message rather than just having the database shut
> down.
>
> If we had per-database user quotas, and per-database users, it would pretty
> much wind up all of the issues which ISPs have with Postgres.
O.K. This makes sens to me. Otherwise I'd like to see quotas per
tablespace. As far as I got it, a tablespace may grow in size untile the
volume is full. Here a grace quota might be usefull as well. Let's say a
5% threshold like the ext filesystem as an default for generating a
warning to th elogs files letting the admin extend the volum(s) by time.
Regards,
Yann
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
