--On Freitag, Juni 10, 2005 21:20:33 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't ALTER [OBJECT] RENAME TO [schema.][name] be a better? After all, this is essentially a rename operation, so maybe it is better to extend existing syntax...
I don't think it's a good idea to merge two different semantics: Renaming a table and "moving" a table to a different schema should be distinguished. Furthermore, i think it's too error prone, because people could accidently issue a "schema move" and renaming a table by a typo....
-- Bernd ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
