"Neil Conway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > > Wasn't the plan to rewrite pg_autovacuum to use the FSM rather than the > stats collector? >
I don't understand. Currently the basic logic of pg_autovacuum is to use the pg_stat_all_tables numbers like n_tup_upd, n_tup_del to determine if a relation need to be vacuumed. How to use FSM to get these information? Regards, Qingqing ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq