"Neil Conway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
> Wasn't the plan to rewrite pg_autovacuum to use the FSM rather than the
> stats collector?
>

I don't understand. Currently the basic logic of pg_autovacuum is to use the
pg_stat_all_tables numbers like n_tup_upd, n_tup_del to determine if a
relation need to be vacuumed. How to use FSM to get these information?

Regards,
Qingqing



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Reply via email to