On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 22:11:25 +1000, John Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I misunderstood the original post as a request for queries NOT to use > indexes where it doesn't match the table contents.
I think that is what they were asking, but I don't think they wanted to see a sequential scan as the alternative. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
