Andrew - Supernews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 2005-06-23, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I looked into the r-tree breakage discussed in this thread: >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2004-03/msg01135.php
> See also http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-01/msg00328.php > in which I made most of the same points. So you did --- I had forgotten. Good to see that we arrived at the same conclusions. > Notice also that contrib/seg and contrib/cube have their own, and > incompatible, idea of what the semantics of &< and &> should be. Um. Not sure what to do about these ... any opinions? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
