On Wednesday 22 June 2005 11:41, Neil Conway wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > But this doesn't make it easier to use - users don't just include those
> > who write it. The antecedent language of these, Ada, from which this
> > syntax comes, was explicitly designed to be reader-friendly as opposed to
> > writer-friendly, and this is a part of that.
>
> IMHO it is just needless verbiage that makes programs both harder to
> read *and* harder to write, albeit marginally so. I think there is a
> reason why Ada-style block terminators are in the minority among
> block-structured languages :)
>
> But obviously this is a matter of taste -- does anyone else like or
> dislike the current syntax?
>
-1 on the proposal to me... ambiguous END statements just looks like trouble
to me. I'd actually rather see you implement label...END LOOP label if you
felt like you had to change *something*.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
