Dave Page wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 24 June 2005 20:45 > > To: Dave Page > > Cc: PostgreSQL-development > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] DBSize backend integration > > > > > My personal view is that pg_database_size, pg_relation_size and > > > pg_tablespace_size, as well as pg_size_pretty should be included. If > > > others consider that the by name versions are also useful, then they > > > should be included, but renamed for consistency. The other three > > > functions should be dropped IMO. > > > > So drop total_relation_size(), relation_size_components(), and what > > else? > > indexes_size()
What is the logic for removing that? Because it is an aggregate of all indexes? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
