On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:35:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> If we yank them ( and I agree) I think we have to do it before feature > >>> freeze. > >> > >> I believe that we have consensus to yank them. Hans says that he did > >> extensive testing back as far as 7.4 and the options had no effect. > > > My opinion is, we'd better test with at least 8.0, or even better with > > current. I think I can do the testing after Jul 1 if those features > > are remained. I have a dual Xeon system with a 15000RPM SCSI disk > > system in my office. > > Well, the proposal is on the table, and the implementation is pretty > obvious. If you want to be sticky about the feature freeze rule, > someone could generate a diff to remove the variables and post it to > -patches before July 1, and then it would be fully per-rules to evaluate > it after July 1.
That'd be needlessly legalistic ... I propose we stick to the "spirit" of the rules, rather than the letter. > I vote not to require ourselves to go through that pushup. I agree. -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>) "Cada quien es cada cual y baja las escaleras como quiere" (JMSerrat) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
