Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
On 6/30/05, Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 June 2005 12:46
To: Dave Page
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration
I have a new idea --- pg_storage_size().
I'm not against that one, but I think Tom's point is vaild. I cannot
think of anything better at the moment though (maybe pg_component_size,
but that's equally random) :-(
Anyone else? Please? Someone? Anyone? :-)
pg_df(text,text)
where the $1 would be the relation name and $2 would
be the type of output (human readable, bytes etc...)
J
pg_diskspace_size()
pg_diskusage_size()
pg_media_used_size()
pg_allocated_size()
pg_diskspace_used()
Regards,
Dawid
PS: Yep, they aren't good...
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
