Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK. Does anybody else have thoughts on removing the PG_ARGISNULL()
> checks? Neil suggests removing them because they'd be unnecessary,
> but I'm concerned about people who'd use the new code with old
> catalog entries that aren't STRICT (e.g., restored from a dump).
I concur with leaving them in for awhile. They aren't all that
expensive ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
