> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Treat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 July 2005 18:21 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Tom Lane; Dawid Kuroczko; Andreas Pflug; Bruce Momjian; > PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration > > > Actually I'd agree with Tom, pg_dbfile_size is ugly, and > suggest to me I could > use a filename as an argument.
I won't repeat Bruce's reply to you, but as an FYI, the reason Bruce suggested pg_dbfile_size over the nicer pg_file_size is that our instrumentation patch includes that particular function, which does accept a filename (provided it's under $PGDATA or the log directory). Dbfile was meant to indicate it's a database related file, rather than some arbitrary filename. /D ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
