"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm currently looking into a problem that a client is reporting that
> pg_dump from 8.0.3 is 'skipping' one of their sequences ... I'm waiting
> for more info, but am curious if anyone knows (or can think of?) any
> reason why this might happen? The only thing I can think of is that the
> sequence is owned by someone other then who the database is being dump'd
> as, and has no permissions to 'read' it ... but anything I'm not thinking
> of?
AFAIK, a permissions problem would result in a pretty obvious error
message from pg_dump ... though it's certainly possible for someone
to ignore that, especially if they are running pg_dump noninteractively.
Skipping in what sense --- no DDL, no setval, both? Is this a
separately created sequence or a SERIAL sequence?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
