Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Works for me. There are some other things about the procdesc stuff
I'm trying to sort out (especially if we should be storing per-call
info inside it).
Hmm, probably not ... check to see if a recursive plperl function
behaves sanely. (This might not have been much of an issue before
we had SPI support in plperl, since there was no way to recurse;
but it is an issue now.)
Behaviour is not good (see below for proof).
ISTM we'll need some sort of implicit of explicit stack of per-call
data. The trick will be getting it to behave right under error recovery.
Looking further ... we already do this implicitly for prodesc in the
call handler - we would just need to do the same thing for per-call
structures and divorce them from prodesc, which can be repeated on the
implicit stack.
I'll work on that - changes should be quite small.
cheers
andrew
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
