Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Dave Page wrote:
> 
> >>The problem is, pg_hba.conf might be editted via the OS unlike the text
> >>version of pg_shadow which is only editted via the server, which would
> >>make appropriate locking nigh-on impossible afaics.
> >>
> >>Unless you're advocating only allowing pg_hba modifications via the
> >>server, in which case it must be started in default configuration before
> >>any mods can be made. That doesn't seem like a good idea to me :-(
> > 
> > 
> > I am thinking we will need load_pg_hba() and write_pg_hba() that will
> > load and write the table to pg_hba.conf.
> 
> Isn't the pg_hba.conf situation quite the same as postgresql.conf? The 
> GUCs with pg_settings is the GUC like a table, but with comments that 
> exceed config_generic.long_desc.

Well, pg_hba.conf is ordered, which is different, and it more of a
columnar values that postgresql.conf.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to