Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> The correct lingo would be standard_conforming_strings. I'm going to change
>> that.
> Sounds good.
No problem here either.
> Another question is whether this should be backpatched to
> our next 7.4.X or 8.0.X release as read-only variables.
Unnecessary; any client code written to use this need only assume that
absence of the parameter means the old behavior.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
