I am not sure it was reported to you but this has been corrected:
        
        test=> CREATE TABLE test(id SERIAL NOT NULL);
        NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "test_id_seq" for 
serial column "test.id"
        CREATE TABLE
        test=> ALTER TABLE TEST OWNER TO testuser;
        ALTER TABLE
        test=>
        test=> SELECT typname, typowner, relname, relowner from pg_type c JOIN 
pg_class d
        test-> ON (d.reltype = c.oid) WHERE typname = 'test';
         typname | typowner | relname | relowner
        ---------+----------+---------+----------
         test    |    16385 | test    |    16385
        (1 row)
        
        test=>
        test=> SELECT typname, typowner, relname, relowner from pg_type c JOIN 
pg_class d
        test-> ON (d.reltype = c.oid) WHERE typname = 'test_id_seq';
           typname   | typowner |   relname   | relowner
        -------------+----------+-------------+----------
         test_id_seq |    16385 | test_id_seq |    16385
        (1 row)
_

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bernd Helmle wrote:
> I discovered the following confusing issue in CVS HEAD:
> 
> CREATE TABLE test(id SERIAL NOT NULL);
> ALTER TABLE TEST OWNER TO testuser;
> 
> SELECT typname, typowner, relname, relowner from pg_type c JOIN pg_class d 
> ON (d.reltype = c.oid) WHERE typname = 'test';
> 
>  typname | typowner | relname | relowner
> ---------+----------+---------+----------
>  test    |       10 | test    |    16419
> 
> 
> SELECT typname, typowner, relname, relowner from pg_type c JOIN pg_class d 
> ON (d.reltype = c.oid) WHERE typname = 'test_id_seq';
>    typname   | typowner |   relname   | relowner
> -------------+----------+-------------+----------
>  test_id_seq |       10 | test_id_seq |    16419
> (1 row)
> 
> As you can see, the owner of the sequence and table row type isn't changed 
> as well. I have done a small patch that adresses this issue for discussion. 
> Please note that it breaks the dependency regression test at least:
> 
>   ALTER TABLE deptest OWNER TO regression_user3;
>   DROP USER regression_user3;
>   ERROR:  role "regression_user3" cannot be dropped because some objects 
> depend on it
> ! DETAIL:  owner of table deptest
>   -- if we drop the object, we can drop the user too
>   DROP TABLE deptest;
>   DROP USER regression_user3;
> --- 33,40 ----
>   ALTER TABLE deptest OWNER TO regression_user3;
>   DROP USER regression_user3;
>   ERROR:  role "regression_user3" cannot be dropped because some objects 
> depend on it
> ! DETAIL:  owner of type deptest
> ! owner of table deptest
>   -- if we drop the object, we can drop the user too
>   DROP TABLE deptest;
>   DROP USER regression_user3;
> 
> Any opinions?
> 
> -- 
>   Bernd

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to