Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Incidentally, use of a different SCM system might well make
constructing test sets more simple. Imagine, say, in SVN, you would
create a branch called "test-set-yyyy-mm-dd" or some such, make your
changes there, add a test script under some well known name, and commit
the branch.
This seems a pretty unconvincing argument for SVN ... we could perfectly
well do that in CVS, no?
You could well be right. And I should know better than to engage in
speculation like that and possibly cause us to be inundated by
proponents of SCMfoo, most of whom will never write a line of code for
postgres let alone ever have to commit anything ;-) Pardon my weakness.
cheers
andrew
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
