I do think plruby would be a nice addition to core. I also assume this is for the 8.2 release, not 8.1.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > > Hmm. I read this as > > > > Problem: not enough hackers to maintain our PL languages. > > > > Proposed solution: add more PL languages. > > > > Somehow this doesn't seem quite right. > > Although I see your point, that actually wasn't my point. My point was > that I felt we need a good well respected (and dare I say *hot*) new > language that was truly OO and could be run as a trusted/untrusted pl > language. > > > > > If pl/ruby is going to get into the core, it should be because of demand > > for it based on its own merits. > > I agree. > > > I don't think this has got anything to > > do with pl/python. > > Not directly but indirectly it does because for me at least, what drove > my negotiations was that plPython is an OO language that I enjoy but > can't use the way I want. pl/Ruby is an OO language that i enjoy that I > *CAN* use the way I want. > > Sincerely, > > Joshua D. Drake > > > -- > Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240 > PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support > Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting > Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/ > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [email protected] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
