Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 06:24:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> IIRC, what we actually intended that to mean is the time of receipt of
>>> the current interactive command --- that is, it gets set in the
>>> postgres.c outer loop, not anywhere in the parser/etc path. Otherwise
>>> there's not a unique answer (consider statements issued inside SQL
>>> functions for instance).
>> Would it be reasonable to add one more timestamp that works the same
>> inside and outside a function? In either case, can anyone think of a
>> less-ambiguous name for timestamp_statement?
> timestamp_client_statement? That highlights it is when the client sends
> the statement.
timestamp_command, maybe, would convey the right image.
(I don't think we need yet a fourth flavor of this, nor do I see anything
about it that "works differently inside and outside a function".)
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
