I wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 8 buffers each, I think, no? That's 32 buffers total.
> You're right; I was thinking that NUM_SLRU_BUFFERS was 4, but I see it's
> now 8. Did we bump that up on the basis of any solid evidence?
Never mind, looks like that goes all the way back: NUM_CLOG_BUFFERS was
8 in 7.2, and we just kept that value. I doubt there's been any testing
of different possible values at all ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
