On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:02:55PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > * Allow INET + INT4 to increment the host part of the address, or > > throw an error on overflow > > > I think that the naively coded function attached does what is needed, e.g., > > What happened to the IPv6 case?
My take on the thread is that the IPv6 case doesn't make sense, and the int8 part was dropped from the TODO. > Also, I think you need to reject CIDR inputs. OK Patrick ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
