On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alternatively: why are we forbidding the value 24:00:00 anyway? Is
> there a reason not to allow the hours field to exceed 23?
One reason is because it's what the standard demand. Another is that it
isn't a proper time, just like feb 31 isn't a proper date.
--
/Dennis Björklund
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
