Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
>> On L, 2005-09-24 at 20:25 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Actually this also probably would not gain you much in 8.1
>>> as vacuum in theory is already dealing with itself.
>>>
>>
>> Interesting. Could you explain it in a more detailed way ?
>> How does vacuum "deal with itself" in 8.1 ?
>>
>>
> Autovacuum is integrated into the backend for 8.1
Can I set the autovacuum parameter per table instead of per
engine ? I'm using pg_autovacuum right now in 7.4 and is not
enough because some tables ( one that implement a materialized
view for example ) are out of an average engine usage and other
tables are so huge to not be analyzed for months.....
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
