> Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think the enhanced pgbench is quite usefull and I would like to > > include in 8.1. Or should I keep it for 8.2? > > Well, we've traditionally been laxer about contrib than the core > software, so the fact that we're past feature freeze isn't sufficient > reason to say "no". I'm inclined to say "yes" because I think this > might make a handy debugging tool --- for instance, Janning Vygen's > current problem with temp tables might be reproducible using a pgbench > script, without having to write any new software.
Ok. I will commit patches and will continue to work on below. > Have you thought about ripping out all the original pgbench code and > instead having a "default script" that duplicates the original behavior? No, but seems an idea. There are few things I need to think about: 1) There are three pgbench's default behaviors: TPC-B like(default), -N and -S. So we need three scripts. 2) it requires a location where those scripts reside. $prefix/etc seems appropriate? > Also it seems like it'd be useful if there could be more than one > script, so as to test situations where the clients aren't all doing > exactly the same thing. How do you assign different scripts to different clients? -- SRA OSS, Inc. Japan Tatsuo Ishii ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
