Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Where are we on this?
We haven't decided what to do.
I think my preference is to allow '24:00:00' (but not anything larger)
as a valid input value of the time datatypes. This for two reasons:
* existing dump files may contain such values
* it's consistent with allowing, eg, '12:13:60', which we
allow even though it's certainly not a valid leap second.
The alternative is to try to catch all places where 23:59:59.something
could get rounded up to 24:00:00, but that looks messy, and it would
introduce a gotcha into calculations on time values.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
