Don't forget insert/update returning. With the deprecation of OID's this
functionality is becoming more and more important when using custom types
and column defaults.

Some method for plpgsql to handle the result sets returned and save to a
variable would be important for this feature too. Select into works but it
would be silly to see something like select a into somevariable from (insert
into tablename (a) default values returning a) instead of an extension to
the insert statement itself.

Kevin McArthur

----- Original Message ----- From: "Rod Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "karen hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL roadmap for 8.2 and beyond.


On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 09:57 -0700, karen hill wrote:
Autovacuum is getting put into the 8.1 release which
is awesome.  A lot of us are wondering now that
PostgreSQL has all the features that many of us need,
what are the features being planned for future
releases?

You know, as PostgreSQL becomes more advanced I find the features on my
"wanted" list growing instead of shrinking.

The reason for this is that I use it in wider and more varied
situations.

I am fairly sure there are easily 5 years worth of work remaining at the
current development pace.

What do you see for 8.2 and beyond? What type of
features are you devs planning for 9.0?  It would be

Here is a summary of the last time this question was asked. Around when
8.0 was about to be released so a small percentage of these might be
done.

Of course, there is also everything in the TODO list and a large part of
the SQL Specs to be implemented on top of all of the below.

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/unsupported-features-sql-standard.html


Dave Fetter:
       * optional interface which sends a row typeoid along with each
       row in a result set
       * more visibility from RULEs into the expression tree generated
       by the parser and/or other RULEs
       * SQL/MED (or at least things that would make it easier to
       implement)
       * Debugging hooks into all the PLs
       * Some way of estimating a "query progress meter" for
       long-running queries
       * MULTISET, COLLECT, UNNEST, FUSION, INTERSECT

       MERGE! MERGE! MERGE! MERGE! MERGE! MERGE!

Gavin Sherry:
       Grouping sets
       Recursive queries
       Window functions
       Updatable views
       Updatable cursors
       Materialised views
       Debug-able PL/PgSQL -- EXPLAIN [ANALYZE] functionality, step
       through?
       Cost estimation for functions -- perhaps a pipe dream, I know

       Performance:

       Better bulk load
       'Continuous' vacuum at a fraction of the IO cost of normal
       vacuum
       Multimaster replication
       General OLTP throughput improvements -- where and how, I'm not
       sure.

       Indexes:

       Bitmap indexes (as opposed to bitmap scans)

Merlin Moncure:
       1. Proper row constructor, such that
       select (1,2,1) > (2,1,1);
       returns the right answer,
       and
       select * from t where (t1,t2,t3) > (c1, c2, c3) order by
       t1,t2,t3 limit
       1
       returns the right answer and uses a index on t1,t2,t3 if it
       exists.

       this is on the TODO.

       2. In the planner, a parameterized limit for prepared statements
       to
       assume a small value (like 1).

       3. Ability to create arrays of composite types (and nest them).

William Zhang:
       * Updatable Views per SQL
       * INTERVAL data type per SQL
       * BLOB/CLOB data type per SQL
       * Faster bulk load
       * Remove "current transaction is aborted, commands ignored ..."
       * Compile with MSVC on Win32 platforms. MySQL support it.
       * Thread safety libpq, ecpg.

Chris Browne:
       - Vacuum Space Map - Maintain a map of recently-expired rows

           This allows vacuum to target specific pages for possible
       free
           space without requiring a sequential scan.

       - Deferrable unique constraint

       - Probably trivially easy would be to add an index to
       pg_listener

       - Tougher but better would be to have pg_listener be an
       in-memory
         structure rather than being physically represented as a table

       - MERGE / UPSERT

       - Config file "#includes" for postgresql.conf, pg_hba.conf

       - Some better ability to terminate backends

       - Automatically updatable views (per SQL 99)

Ron Mayer:
       Standards stuff:

         * Updateable views (easier to use Ruby/Rails's ActiveRecord on
       legacy data)
         * The elementary OLAP stuff

       Contrib related stuff:

         * Contrib/xml2 working with XML Namespaces.
         * Some sort of GIST index for querying XML data (XPath?
       SQL/XML?)

         * The array functions and indexes from contrib/intarray
           and contrib/intagg made more general to work with other
           data types. (I find these contrib modules quite useful)

       Annoyances:

         * more sane math with intervals. For example, try:
           select '0.01 years'::interval, '0.01 months'::interval;

       Ease of use:

         * Nice defaults for autovacuum and checkpoints and bgwriter
           that automatically avoid big I/O spikes by magically
           distributing I/O in a nice way.

       Easier COPY for client library authors:

         * A way to efficiently insert many values like COPY from STDIN
           from client libraries that don't support COPY from STDIN.
           Perhaps it could happen through the apparently standards
           compliant
           "INSERT INTO table VALUES (1,2),(3,4),(5,6)"   [feature id
       F641]
           or perhaps through a new
           COPY tablename FROM STRING 'a big string instead of stdin'
           feature that would be easier for clients to support?

           It seems in most new client libraries COPY FROM STDIN
           stays broken for quite a long time.  Would a
           alternative COPY FROM A_BIG_STRING be easier for them
           to support and therefore available more often?

       Meta-stuff

         * A failover plus load-balancing (pgpool+slony?)
           installer for dummies that handles simple cases.

         * A single place to find all the useful non-core stuff
           like projects on pgfoundry, gborg, contrib, and
           various other places around the net (PL/R PL/Ruby Postgis).
           Perhaps if the postgresql website had a small wiki
           somewhere where anyone could add links with a short
           description to any such projects it'd be easier to
           know what's out there...

         * Nice APIs and documentation [probably already exists]
           to continue encouraging projects like PostGIS and PL/R
           that IMHO are the biggest advantage of postgresql over
           the commercial vendors' offerings.

Heikki Linnakangas:
       * concurrent, partial vacuum that would for example only scan
       pages that
       happen to be in memory
       * index-only scans
       * database assertions

       * lightwight PITR that wouldn't require to shut down and restore
       a backup.
       I'm thinking something like "REWIND TO xid 12345". It could be
       implemented
       by just setting already-committed transactions as aborted in the
       clog
       (vacuum and commit status hint bits need to be disabled
       beforehand). This
       would be very handy for automatic regression testing
       applications. You
       could load the test database just once, then run test case,
       rewind, run
       another test case, rewind and so on.

       As more disruptive longer-term things:

       * multiple alternative access plans for prepared statements. For
       example,
       if you have a query like "SELECT * FROM history WHERE timestamp
       BETWEEN ?
       AND ?", the optimal access plan depends a lot on the parameters.
       Postgres
       could keep all the plans that are optimal for some combination
       of
       parameters, and choose the most efficient one at execution time
       depending
       on the parameters. The execution side would actually be quite
       simple to
       implement. Introduce a new conditional node type that has > 1
       child
       nodes, and a condition that is evaluated at execution time and
       determines
       which child node to use. Determining the conditions would
       require big
       changes to the planner and estimation routines.

       * support for Tutorial D as an alternative to SQL. It would be
       great for
       educational purposes.

My own wish list:
       * Identity/generator support (per standard)
       * Merge (update/insert as required)
       * Multi-CPU sorts. Take a large single sort like an index
       creation and split the work among multiple CPUs.

--


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

              http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to