> > Hm, what were the tests exactly?  Offhand I'd expect 
> something like a 
> > SELECT COUNT(*) on a large but not-too-wide table to show 
> noticeable 
> > improvement.
> > 
> >                     regards, tom lane
> I STAND CORRECTED!  My tests were high volume record by 
> record iterators, etc.  Read and drool, gentlemen.

Wow, that's just great!

Was that with the volatile attribute or not?

//Magnus

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to