"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 04:48:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Sounds that way.
> Is this something that should be logged better than it is?
We don't even know what it is yet, so that question seems a bit premature.
> Is there any value in trying to save the index/table that's busted?
It'd probably be worth making a copy for forensic purposes before you
REINDEX it.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
