On 11/11/05, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jaime Casanova wrote: > > MERGE seems to me the better option... not just because is standard > > but at least i can see some use cases for it... > > I don't think you understand my message: MERGE does not do what REPLACE > does. > > -- > Peter Eisentraut > http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ >
I understand you well... what i was trying to say is that i prefer MERGE (standard SQL command) to be done because the functionally it has (basically a merge of two tables) seems to me to be more usefull than REPLACE (MySql Command)... -- regards, Jaime Casanova (DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
