* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Normally I'd plump for following the standard ... but AFAIR, we have had > bucketloads of requests for REPLACE functionality, and not one request > for spec-compatible MERGE. If, as it appears, full-spec MERGE is also a > whole lot harder and slower than REPLACE, it seems that we could do > worse than to concentrate on doing REPLACE for now. (We can always come > back to MERGE some other day.)
Not to be too much of a pain, but I asked for full-spec MERGE a while
back... :) I don't think I was the only one asking for full-spec MERGE
in the "What features would you like to see in Postgres?" thread a while
ago either, though I could be wrong.
I'd like to see MySQL-like 'replace' too, of course. :)
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
