Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In the above for large relations, the bulk of the REINDEX should > happen without any locks being held by the REINDEX operation.
As I just pointed out to Greg, the arm-waving notion that you can "turn off the FSM" requires a great deal of low-level locking that is not there now. Even ignoring that, you *still* have a lock upgrade problem in this sketch. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend