On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Yeah, the non-transaction-controlled distinction is really not very > useful. I believe Vadim put it in originally because he wanted to go to > a REDO/UNDO approach, in which it would've been important to tell the > difference, but we never did that (and probably never will). I've > preserved the distinction because it seemed worthwhile from the > standpoint of documentation and logical clarity, but if you see a reason > to get rid of it, I won't argue hard for it. > No strong reasons to remove them, though the comments are kind of confusing. Regards, Qingqing ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
