On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> Does your application drop these temp tables explicitly, or leave them
> to be dropped automatically during commit? It might be interesting to
> see whether changing that makes any difference.
I drop them explicitly at the end of the function.
> I'm also curious
> whether the transaction that makes the temp table is ever rolled back
> instead of committed.
Not intentionally/explicitly. The only time it should roll back is if it
gets an error (which tends to be this error). I do sometimes hit ^C on
the perl scripts to tweak something, which would roll it back if in this
particular code, but I don't think i did that on the last run at least.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>
--
Every little picofarad has a nanohenry all its own.
-- Don Vonada
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
