> David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> <aol>I also think this would make a great pgfoundry project :)</aol> > > Yeah ... unless there's some reason that it needs to be tied to PG > server releases, it's better to put it on pgfoundry where you can > have your own release cycle. >
I don't need pfoundry, per se' but I was hoping that it could be part of the core distribution. My personal feelings are these: I use PHP a lot and I use PostgreSQL a lot for what I do. PHP plays favorites, they actively promote MySQL even though it is a bad database in the database sense. I would like to see PostgreSQL, at least passivly, include niceties for PHP users. In quaint terms, "show them you care." On a side note, PostgreSQL is a little too self centric. It is a great project that doesn't get the credit it deserves and I think that it is because the project, as a whole, doesn't try to actively court or support popular applications. The pgfountry and formally gborg are reat, but unless you actively promote them people can't find them. There should e a big huge button and/or link to pgfountry that shows how much is availale to PostgreSQL. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
