Hannu Krosing wrote: > Due to current implementation of vacuum, > you have to abandon continuous vacuuming during vacuum of bigtable, but > i have written and submitted to "patches" list a patch which allows > vacuums not to block each other out, this is stalled due to Tom's > "unesyness" about its possible hidden effects, but it should be > available from "patches" list to anyone in distress :p
Do you use it in production? Have you noticed any ill effects? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
